Brandon Blackstock has one thing to say about his ex-wife Kelly Clarkson’s newest lawsuit.
On Monday, Blackstock responded to the American Idol star’s newest lawsuit during which she claimed he ought to pay her greater than the $2.6 million {that a} California labour commissioner dominated he owed her for illegally appearing like an “unlicensed expertise company” since 2007 — when she entered an oral settlement along with his household’s firm Starstruck Leisure.
Per the paperwork obtained by Web page Six, Blackstock denied “every allegation” made by the Stronger singer and argued the submitting needs to be dismissed as a result of the labour commissioner’s ruling was made in November 2023.
Since Clarkson, 41, did not “file a discover of attraction inside 10 days,” from when the choice was made so as to request greater than the $2.6 million that was dominated upon, Blackstock and his attorneys declare it’s exterior of the right jurisdiction to file a separate lawsuit now, based on the docs.
The paperwork furthered that “any alleged unlawful procurement” obtained from appearing because the TV persona’s “unlicensed expertise company” has already been paid out partially or in full to Clarkson and Blackstock’s group property.
The paperwork additionally learn Clarkson’s “criticism fails to state info ample to represent a reason behind motion in opposition to Starstruck,” arguing it’s “barred for failure.”
Reps for Clarkson weren’t instantly out there for remark.
In March, Clarkson filed the brand new lawsuit in opposition to her ex-husband after the commissioner dominated he and Starstruck Leisure violated California’s Expertise Businesses Act by procuring employment for the discuss present host regardless of not being a licensed agent.
The labour commissioner declared Blackstock, 47, ought to’ve by no means been part of the pop star’s offers for the Billboard Music Awards, Wayfair, The Voice and Norwegian Cruise Strains.
“Primarily based on the wrongful acts and conduct of Starstruck … all agreements between the events, needs to be declared void and unenforceable … and all moneys beforehand paid by cross-complainants to Starstruck needs to be disgorged from Starstruck, forthwith,” Clarkson’s lawsuit obtained by Web page Six learn.
The Since You’ve Been Gone hitmaker argued she needs to be reimbursed for “commissions, charges, income, advances, producing charges or different moneys.”
On the time of Clarkson’s submitting, Blackstock’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, fired again at her in an announcement shared with Rolling Stone.
“It’s morally, ethically and legally fallacious to try to get moneys again out of your ex-husband who not solely helped her as her supervisor however who used these earnings on their youngsters and Kelly and Brandon’s life-style in the course of the marriage,” he wrote.
Since 2020, Blackstock and Clarkson have been in a back-and-forth struggle over her million-dollar fortune as Starstruck beforehand sued her for $1.4 million in unpaid commissions for her jobs on The Kelly Clarkson Present and The Voice.
On the time, the corporate argued they “invested a substantial amount of time, cash, vitality and dedication” into her profession, turning the As a result of Of You singer into “a mega celebrity.”
In the meantime, the previous couple referred to as it quits in 2020 with Clarkson submitting the divorce papers.
Their divorce was finalised in 2022, with Clarkson ordered to pay her ex a one-time fee of $1.3 million, $45,601 monthly in youngster assist and $150,000 monthly in spousal assist.
The 2 share 9-year-old daughter, River, and 8-year-old son, Remington.
This text initially appeared in Web page Six and was reproduced with permission.
